The poems nothings changed Essay Example for Free

The poems nothings changed EssayIn stanza three the main focal point is on the inn. Afrika sees the inn as if it is showing off, forward with glass this could mean that it is being rubbed in the fact he cant commit anything that extravagant. He alike gives the impression that it wants to be noticed, name flaring give care flag, he uses personification to show how much it stands out, he also uses alliteration to make it catchy and so we will remember it. It could also be utilize the flag reference to compare it to their nation, and that it is being represented by what the government want other people to see, not what is actually going on.He is great(p) the inn a personality, it squats this is contradicting the previous statements, with the use of personification it is almost as if the inn is embarrassed about having these features. The inn is upper-class, In the grass and the weeds, incipient sort Jackson trees it is also out of place, as the port Jackson trees are expensi ve and imported, how ever district six is made up of weeds. The inn also only lets white people in, whites only inn although this was illegal after apartheid had ended, he uses a pun here as in only whites allowed in, and it is a whites only, inn.In the beginning of verse four he says no sign says it is but we know where we belong this makes the reader empathise with him, at this point at that place is know apartheid but he still know that the can not mix. When he looks in on the continueaurant there is a contrast with the rest of district six, crushed ice white glasses, linen falls, the single rose there are many luxuries here, it is almost snobbism , while every where else has to clean bewitch by.This again makes you feel sympathetic towards him. In verse five the working mans cafi has a huge contrast to the restaurant, working mans cafi sells bunny chows bunny chow is a cheap African food, this is totally unlike the haute cuisine in the white restaurant, which is an upmarket food. He also has no plate to eat on, eat it at a plastic t competent top he does not have linen falls or a rose there is a defined contrast between them.I think that there is a difference in between because the white have more money and privileges than the blacks also if the blacks did have an inn like that they would not be able to afford it. The writer is trying to put across the point that it is unfair that they should have more than them, just because they are white. In the final verse he feels small, boy again he feels insignificant, and he knows he can not change anything.He feels the indispensableness to use violence to get his point across Hands burn for a stone, a bomb this could insinuate that he want to be able to be heard. He wants to kerfuffle the glass, shiver down the glass the glass could be thought to be a barrier between blacks and whites, and he wants to break it down as if he were breaking down the wall of apartheid. The use of glass for the wall of apartheid could mean that it is fragile. The last line is nothings changed which is the first line, this could be construe as a circle, and that apartheid will never end.